A Paper by Chang Tsong-zung, in conjunction with CHINA IN ASIA/ASIA IN CHINA

Columbia University, April 18 2012
This paper by Chang Tsong-zung was delivered in abstentia by Jane DeBevoise, in conjunction with a panel CHINA IN ASIA/ASIA IN CHINA: Imagining Asia in Contemporary Chinese Art, organized by Columbia University and Asia Art Archive in America. From the perspective of contemporary visual art practice, this panel will interrogate the role of China in Asia and Asia in China from multiple perspectives. Acknowledging that the concept of Asia itself is a construct which has been put to multiple purposes in the 20th century, this panel looked at how projects in this Asian space have begun to emerge in the imaginary of contemporary practice in China, particularly in the last five years. This panel also explored how China figures in the imaginary of artists today, and in particular artists working in India, Japan, Korea and Vietnam.

China’s singular obsession with everything western, from politics and economics to culture and philosophy, is a phenomenon apparent to everybody. This is not a new “cultural turn” for China. China’s preoccupation with the West began in early 19th century, and it has eclipsed China’s cultural interest in all of its neighbours, all except Japan, with whom, as we know, China has had a century-long love and hate entanglement. For a start, China’s access to Western ideas in the 19th century had much to do with Japan, whose translation program overtook China even with China’s head start. It is impossible for modern China to disengage itself from this intellectual influence, because the modern Chinese vernacular tongue cannot be spoken without using many of these Japanese translated terms. Japan was also one of the early Chinese destinations to study modernization. The 1894 Naval War and the 1937 Japanese invasion have put a wall between the two countries. More significantly, Japanese imperial ambitions have turned sour the concept of a pan-Asian alliance. Today, if either China or Japan brings up the concept, accusation of imperialist design would immediately be lodged by the West.

Historically, Korea was always a conduit between Chinese and Japanese cultures, and today Korea still looms large in the Chinese imagination on account of Chinese involvement in the 1950 Korean War. However, having changed sides from one side of the Cold War to the other, China is now in an awkward position with both Koreas.

With India, the only major intellectual exchange in the 20th century was Rabindranath Tagore’s famous visit in 1924. Tagore’s quest was to bring together “eastern civilizations” as an alternative to western values. The visit was a disappointment as it did not go down well in China, especially with Left leaning intellectuals, whose interest was Chinese modernization through westernization. Interestingly, when Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek visited India in the 1940s to urge an Asian alliance against Japanese imperialism, he couldn’t resist making a speech against colonialism on the eve of his departure, even though his British host specifically warned him against it.

The one important legacy of Asian cooperation was the Bandung accord in Indonesia when the concept of the Third World was enthusiastically received by China and subsequently championed by Mao Zedong. But border war with India in 1964 naturally put paid to Sino-Indian fraternity.

What becomes apparent with these various connections, when looked at together, is the common cultural-political predicament of Asian countries in the face of imperialism: Imperialism either manifested as colonialism (both territorial and cultural), and as exploitative capitalism. The fact that 19th century Japan needed to define its modernity as a policy that  “turned back on Asia in order to engage Europe” underscores this imperialist character of modernity. Cold War politics that has divided China, Korea, Southeast Asia also reveals the fact that both capitalism and communist socialism are committed to a historical project of modernity, and neither choice is successful in addressing local Asian social historical realities.

To understand the realities confronting Asia, experience of both sides of the Cold War is not enough, as evidenced by China’s dramatic political experiments. Comparative Asian experience is necessary. In other words, it is possible for an Asian country to see clearly its contemporary situation only under an inter-Asian perspective. This is the rationale behind the project “West Heavens”, an Indian-Chinese exchange of contemporary art and social thought. “West Heavens” is an old Chinese reference to India, and the plural for “Heavens” is a quest for viable alternatives to monotheism.

West Heavens started with an art exhibition and a “Summit for Social Thought” in 2010.

Tushar Joag, Riding Rocinante From Bombay to Shanghai via Sardar Sarovar and the Three Gorges. Photo courtesy of the artist and West Heavens Project

In 2011, a film program together with a companion series of forums on film theory, “You Don’t Belong” traveled to 4 cities in China. The project will go on to Hong Kong and Taiwan this year. A return program of Chinese documentary film to India is being planned for 2012.

Repairing and editing the celluloid of Komal Gandhar (1961, Ritwik Ghatak) in Shanghai Film Technology Plant. Photo courtesy of West Heavens Project

Currently, the Mumbai Urbanist group KRVIA and Tongji University are working on a comparative case study of slums and relocation.

SAME-SAME: Mumbai Shanghai Urbanist Project, a collaboration between KRVIA and Tongji University. Photo courtesy of West Heavens Project

With the West Heavens project we hope to create a fresh imagination about contemporary India; we hope to highlight India’s leading intellectual achievements. In China, the popular view is still about animals on the street and the caste system, while baffled by the Indian economy and its creative industry. For China, the significance of engaging India is to appreciate its radically different path to modernity. China embraced western modern principles full-heartedly, championing it as a means to correct the “wrongs” of its own heritage. To China even until today, the West has a distant romantic aura, to say the least. On the other hand, India has modernity thrust upon it through two centuries of colonialism, and India’s critique of the West is a view made from the inside out.

China’s path to modernity has been moulded by a series of revolutions, which has overthrown shackles of the past to create new social forms. The damage of revolution is to become radically removed from our historical roots. India overthrew colonial domination, but has characteristically preserved colonial institutions after independence. And yet, when comparing post-revolutionary China with post-colonial India, we cannot help but be amazed at the prevalence of left wing politics in India. There are currently over forty major parties of Communism in India, engaging in varying forms of revolutionary tactic. At the same time India is also impressively the world’s biggest democracy. China’s encounter with India inadvertently raises the suspicion: whether if China’s revolution harbours a latent colonial gene? Conversely, whether the Indian version of post-colonialism is in fact another form of revolution? China’s singular state purpose has completed the most daunting social engineering in history; but in terms of diversity and richness of historical culture it is no match for the treasure trove of India, where old and new traditions co-exist on the level of daily life. If “Enlightenment” is supposed the legacy of modernity, this close encounter of Asian cultures should be a project of self-enlightenment.

I wish to close this presentation with a paragraph I wrote for the Foreword of West Heavens exhibition catalogue:

“For more than a century, challenges of imperialism and capitalism have forced India and China to develop political strategies that have profoundly transformed both societies. To share this experience is valuable for Indians and Chinese alike. For China, long before the seismic cultural shift towards the West, it had experienced one other profound cultural turn: when Chinese pilgrims sought out the teachings of the Buddha. The Buddhist turn did not result in destructive fervour like the past century of revolutions, but its influence was just as far reaching; and Buddhist learning took many centuries before it was fully absorbed into Confucian scholarship. Today, after a century of revolutions, it is important to remember this history of cultural self-transformation. It is critical to remind ourselves that in our imagination of the world there is not just the West, but also the ‘West Heavens’.”

For more information about the West Heavens Project, please click here.


20th century, abstract art, Abstraction, Access, acrylic, acrylic painting, Afghanistan, Alternative Space, American History, american revolution, Animation, Anthology, anthropology, Architecture, Archive, art, Art Administration, art and society, art history, art writing, Artificial Intelligence, artist book, artist's book, artist’s book, asia, Asia Art Archive, Asia-Pacific Triennale, Asian American, Australia, Automation, Autonomy, avant-garde, Bangladesh, Books, Brooklyn, Buddhism, Burma, Butoh, Cambodia, care-giving, Catalogue, Censorship, Central Asia, ceramic art, ceramics, Chance, charcoal, Chengdu, China, Chinatown, chinese, Chinese-American, cities, civil rights movement, collage, Collecting, collection, Collections, Collective, Collectivity, commercial art, Communism, Composition, conceptual art, conceptual photography, Conservation, contemporary, contemporary art, Cultural Revolution, culture, Curating, Cutlural Revolution, Dance, Design, desire, Diaspora, digital, Digital Archives, digital art, digital poetics, digital print, Displacement, DNA, Documentary, Domestic Labor, Drawing, east asia, Economics, Education, encyclopedia, EPOXY, essays, exhibition, Exhibition History, Experimental Music, family, Family Archives, Family Images, Feminism, Festivals, fibre art, Fiction, Field-recording, Film, Fluxus, Folklore, Form, Foundations, Gender, Genetics, Geography, ghosts, Godzilla, Graphic Design, Graphic Novel, group exhibition, Gutai, Gwangju Biennale, heneng, histories, history, Hong Kong, hong kong S.A.R., humanities, Identity, imagined realities, Imaging, Imitation, immigrant, in situ, independent art space, Independent Publisher, Index, India, Indonesia, Infrastructure, ink, ink and colors, ink painting, ink-painting, Installation, installation art, Institution, interactive art, Internet, internet art, Iran, Island, Japan, jiang tiefeng, Khmer Rouge, Korea, Labor, Land, Land Art, Language, Lhasa, Libraries, literature, liu shaohui, Locality, Madagascar, Malaysia, Manananggal, Map, mapping, Memory, Mexico, Migrant Workers, Migration, Miniature Painting, Minimalism, mixed media, mixed-media, MOCA, Model Opera, modern art, mourning, Moving Image, multi-media art, multimedia, multimedia art, Murals, Museum studies, Museums, Music, Myanmar, mythology, nationalism, Nations, net art, new media, New Media Art, New York City, North Africa, nostalgia, oil, oil painting, Oral Histories, Organization, painting, paintings, Pakistan, Pakistani, participatory, Pedagogy, people, Perennial exhibition, Performance, performance art, Philippines, photo installation, photograph, photographs, Photography, politics, Pop Culture, Pop Music, Preservation, print, printmaking, prints, Propaganda, Protest, Public Space, Publication, Publishing, Realism, Research, Revolution, Saudi Arabia, Sci-Fi, Science, Sculpture, Secrets, Shamanism, Singapore, slavery, Small Press, social histories, socialism, Socialist Realism, socially engaged art, sociology, sociopolitical, Sonic Art, sound, Sound Art, sound installation, South Asia, South East Asia, south korea, Southeast Asia, spirituality, Sri Lanka, structural film, Surveillance, System, Taiwan, technology, Television, text, Thailand, the Middle East, The Philippines, Theater, Tibet, Time-Based Media, Tomato Grey, Tradition, trama, Translation, triennial, Tunisia, uncertainty, United States, united states of america, Unity, USA, Uyghur, Vampires, Video Art, Video Game, Vietnam, Violence, Virtual Reality, visual arts, visual culture, VR, War, water color, Water Rights, watercolor, watercolour painting, woman artist, women, women artist, women artists, wood, woodcuts, writing, Xinjiang, yunnan school of painting, Zhejiang Academy, Zine


Aisha Khalid, Aki Onda, Alexander Keefe, Alexandra Chang, Alexandra Munroe, Alf Chang, Amy Lien, Amy WOOD, Annysa Ng, Anthony Yung, Arin Rungjang, Ashley Billingsley, Ashok Sukumaran, Bani Abadi, Bani Abidi, Barbara London, Benjamin Moskowitz, Beth Citron, Betsy Damon, Bing Lee, Birgit DONKER, Boon Hui Tan, Boris Groys, Brinda Kumar, Cai Guoqiang, CAMP, Cao Fei, Casey Tang, Chang Chao Tang, Chen Chieh-jen, Chen Tong, Chen Wei-ching, Chen Xiaomei, Chihoi, Chitra Ganesh, Chris Wu, Christoph NOE, Christopher K. Ho, Christopher Phillips, Chương-Đài Võ, Cici Wu, Cooperativa Cráter Invertido, Cosmin Costinas, David Smith, Desire Machine Collective, Dinh Q Le, Dooeun Choi, DREAMER FTY, Ei Arakawa, Eleanor Heartney, Enzo Camacho, EPOXY Art Group, Erin Gleeson, Eugene Wang, Fang Lu, Farah Wardani, Fei Dawei, FENG Yuan(馮原), Franklin Furnace, Frédéric Dialynas Sanchez, Furen Dai, fwf, Gao Shiming, Gianni Jetzer, Glenn Phillips, Go Hirasawa, Hajra Waheed, Hammad Nasar, Heman Chong, Herb Tam, Hiroko Tasaka, Hitomi Iwasaki, Ho Tzu Nyen, Howie Chen, Hsu Chia-Wei, Huang Chien-Hung, Huang Hua-Chen, HUANG Xiaopeng, I-Hua Lee, Il Lee, Ingrid Chu, Interference Archive, Jaeyong Park, Jane DeBevoise, Jean-Hubert Martin, Jen Hoyer, Jen Liu, Jennifer Davis, Jewyo Rhii, Joan Lebold Cohen, Joanne, John Pirozzi, John Tain, José Maceda, Julian Ross, Jun Yang, June Yap, Kaho Albert Yu, Katherine Grube, Kim Yong-Ik, Kimia Maleki, Kit Yi Wong, Koki Tanaka, Korakrit Arunanondchai, Laurel Ptak, Lê Thuận Uyên, Lee Kit, Lee Mingwei, Lee Weng Choy, Lesley Ma, Levi Easterbrooks, Li Ming, Li Ran, Li Xiaofei, Liang Jianhua, Lin Yilin, LinDa Saphan, Lisa Ross, Liu Ding, Liu Shiyuan, Lynn Gumpert, Lyno Vuth, Maline Yim, Mao Chenyu, MAP Office, Margaret Lee, Margo Machida, Mariam Ghani, Martha Wilson, Marvin Taylor, Meghan Forbes, Meiya Cheng, Mel Bochner, Michelle Wong, Michelle Yun, Midori Yoshimoto, Ming Fay, Minoru Yoshida, Miwako Tezuka, Moe Satt, Mukaddas Mijit, Murtaza Vali, Museum of Unknown, Nadim Abbas, Naeem Mohaiemen, Nate Hun, Nico Baumbach, Nikhil Raunak, Nonny de la Peña, Nora Taylor, nos:books, Ocean Leung, Onejoon Che, Pad.ma, Pak Sheung Chuen, Pan An-yi, Park Chankyong, Passenger Pigeon Press, Patty Chang, Pi Li, Polit-Sheer-Form Office, Prem Krishnamurthy, Qiu Anxiong, Qiu Deshu, Qiu Zhijie, Rabbya Naseer, Rania Ho, Raqs Media Collective, Reiko Tomii, Richard Vine, Rina Banerjee, Risha Lee, Rob Smith, Roslisham Ismail a.k.a. Ise, Ruijun Shen, Ryan Lee Wong, Saadia Toor, Sabih Mohd Ahmed, Sam Hart, Samita Sinha, Samsom Young, Samson Young, Sareth Svay, Sean Anderson, Sen Uesaki, Shaina Anand, Shanta Rao, Sharmini Pereira, Shen Xin, Shiraga Kazuo, Shuddhabrata Sengupta, Simon Wu, Sming Sming Books, Sohl Lee, Son Ni, Song Dong, Sopheap Pich, Stephanie Comilang, Stephanie H. Tung, Stephen Teiser, Su Yu-Hsien, Sung Hwan Kim, Sunghee Lee, Tabaimo, Takahiko Iimura, Takako Tanabe, Takeshi Ikeda, Tammy Nguyen, Tang Kwok Hin, Taro Hanaga, Teresa Kwong, The Dunhuang Foundation, The Otolith Group, Theresa Hak Kyung Cha, Tiffany Chung, Tobias Madison, Tom Looser, Trần Minh Đức, Uli Sigg, Umber Majeed, Vivian Sming, Wang Jianwei, Wang Jing, Wang Wei, William LIM, Work on Work, Wu Shanzhuan, Xiaoyu Weng, Xie Xiaoze, Xin Wang, Xu Bing, Xu Tan, YANG Jiechang, Yang Wang, Yin Xiuzhen, Ying Kwok, Yoon Hwan Bae, YOUNG-HAE CHANG HEAVY INDUSTRIES, Yung MA, Zhang Hongtu, Zhang Peili, Zheng Shengtian, Zhenzhen Qi, Zhou Tao, Zoe Butt